RescuePaw logoContact
A search-and-rescue dog wearing RescuePaw carbon exoskeleton boots leaping across collapsed-building rubble; the RescuePaw shield logo appears on the right.

You spent years training this dog.
Then you sent it in barefoot.

Not by choice. Conventional boots block the paw pad sensation a K9 relies on to read unstable ground, and they cover the claws it uses to grip debris — so the moment the boots go on, agility goes down. That leaves handlers with one workable option: sending the dog onto rubble, glass and rebar with nothing between skin and steel. RescuePaw is being built to resolve that paradox.

Close-up of a RescuePaw open-toe boot: a carbon toe guard above and bare claws gripping the edge of broken concrete.

We kept the claws.

Dogs grip rubble with their claws, which is precisely why ours is the first protective boot designed to leave them free to do it.

The paradox handlers know too well

Boots on: senses off.

Close-up of a working dog's front paws in conventional rubber boots, standing on broken concrete rubble.

Rubber soles dull the paw pad, which is the organ a dog uses to read vibration, slope and texture, while enclosed toes cover the very claws it needs to grip rubble.

Gordon LE, Ho B. J Am Vet Med Assoc. 2020;256(3):322

Boots off: zero protection.

A search-and-rescue dog standing barefoot on a collapsed concrete slab, beside exposed rebar and broken glass.

Going barefoot restores full awareness and full traction, but it leaves nothing between the paw and broken concrete, rebar or glass — so the injuries accumulate, deployment after deployment.

The field signal

The injuries are documented. The solution isn’t. Yet.

0–0 months

of training before a single K9 search team can be certified

US House Homeland Security testimony, 2017

0.0%

of working dogs sustained injuries — most were musculoskeletal

Spinella et al., 2023View paper ↗

0%

of FEMA-certified dogs were injured or ill after the Oso landslide, where abrasions, pad wear and paw pad splits led the list

Gordon LE. JAVMA. 2015;247(8):901View paper ↗

0.0%

of all K9 mission-loss days traced back to injury

Harroun-White et al., 2024View paper ↗

Across deployments, wounds to the paws and lower limbs are consistently among the most reported injuries, and the tradeoff that causes them has been documented for as long as these teams have been deploying. What has not happened in all that time is a solution.

Our approach

A German Shepherd standing in profile wearing the full RescuePaw system: carbon exoskeleton frames on all four legs with open-toe boots.

ASemi-open toe guard

A carbon shell protects the top of the toes while the front stays open, so the claws can keep working as the climbing spikes they already are.

BFull-leg carbon exoskeleton

A single continuous frame runs from the paw to the femur, shielding the lower joints without adding the bulk of a conventional harness. Bio-flexible joints and padding let the frame move with the leg rather than against it.

COn-device AI

Sensors in the sole feed an AI that lives inside the boot itself, which means the system can sense, decide and warn without a network, a cloud, or any signal at all.

DLoad path

The impact of each landing is routed along the frame so that it bypasses the knee joint and disperses into thigh muscle instead.

It warns the paw that’s in danger.

A short vibration at the ankle carries a single meaning — get that paw off the ground — and dogs learn to read cues like this the way they learn any other command. Research on vibration-cued working dogs shows they respond to such signals reliably once the association is trained.

1

Sense

Sensors embedded in the sole read the pressure and motion of every footfall, catching the early signs of ground that is about to give way.

2

Warn

The moment the on-board AI flags unstable ground, a vibration fires at the ankle of the paw that touched it, so the warning reaches the limb that is actually at risk.

3

Withdraw

The dog pulls that paw back and shifts its weight away — the response it has been trained to give to that one signal, delivered through a channel that noise, distance and darkness cannot block.

0%

success rate for vibration-cued canine commands

Byrne et al., 2017 · reviewed in Jean-Joseph & Bovet, Animals, 2026View paper ↗

A German Shepherd in RescuePaw exoskeleton boots stepping on cracked concrete; glowing orange rings radiate from the haptic module at its ankle.

Jean-Joseph, H., & Bovet, D. (2026). Haptic Signals as a Communication Tool Between Handlers and Dogs: Review of a New Field. Animals, 16(2), 323.

View paper ↗

This review gathers the studies that have tested wearable vibration devices on working dogs. Across them, dogs reliably perceived vibration through the skin and, once trained, discriminated cues by intensity, by where on the body the signal arrived, and by its rhythm — reaching success rates above 90% in the strongest results. Existing work has concentrated on vests and harnesses worn on the torso, which is what makes the lower limb an open question, and one RescuePaw is being built to answer.

No signal. No problem.

A search-and-rescue dog in RescuePaw exoskeleton boots with glowing haptic modules, moving through a dark collapsed structure.

Collapsed buildings block wireless almost completely, which is why our AI senses, decides and warns entirely inside the boot.

Wearables watch the wrong place

Commercial K9 wearables cluster on the collar and torso, whereas the injuries working dogs actually sustain concentrate in the paws and lower limbs. RescuePaw mounts low and slim along the legs, which puts the protection exactly where the damage happens.

Smart gear dies where dogs work

Cloud analysis, cellular links and Wi-Fi all fail inside collapsed structures — which is exactly where rescue dogs work. That is why RescuePaw runs its entire loop, from sensing to warning, on the device itself: there is simply nothing to disconnect.

Fast enough for a footfall

A warning only helps if it arrives before the paw commits its weight, which is a far shorter window than any network round trip allows. The system is being designed so that sensing and decision both happen within a single footfall, on hardware small enough to sit inside the boot and frugal enough to run there all day.

One limb, three systems

Every subsystem lives on the limb itself, which means nothing has to be bolted on after the fact.

01Guard

A carbon shell over the toes, open at the front so the claws stay in contact with the ground.

02Sense

A four-layer sole that reads the ground and an AI that decides what it means, both inside the boot.

03Frame

A continuous carbon structure that carries landing impact past the knee and into the thigh.

Exploded view of the RescuePaw sole: mesh top layer, cushioning midsole, sensor circuit layer with glowing pressure points, and lugged rubber outsole.

Sole, layer by layer

MeshA breathable top layer that manages moisture across a full working day.
CushionA midsole that absorbs the impact of every footfall before it reaches the joint.
SensorsA circuit layer reading pressure and motion, so the boot knows what the ground is doing as the paw lands on it.
GripA high-traction outsole built for surfaces that are wet, dust-covered, or broken apart.

Every working year counts

0–0 yrs

of training to certify one rescue dog

~USD0K

invested per dog before its first deployment

0.0

people rescued per dog, per year

Korea Fire Agency / National 119 Rescue HQ data, 2020–2024 (KRW 200M training cost, approx. conversion)

Preventable paw injuries cut those careers short, which means protection pays for itself long before the dog retires.

We’re building this — but not without you

RescuePaw is at concept stage, and before we commit to hardware we want to hear from the organizations that actually run K9 SAR operations. Your answers directly shape what we build first.

Field demand

Have your dogs sustained paw or lower-leg injuries on collapse or debris deployments, and if so, did the protective gear available to you meet the need?

Advisory input

Would you be open to a short call or video meeting? We can walk you through the technical concept, and we would value your view on the conditions a device has to meet before it is usable in a real operation.

Pilot and adoption

If field demand is confirmed and we build a working prototype, would your organization consider a small field trial, and — depending on how that goes — a further conversation about adoption?

60-second field check

01Have your dogs sustained paw or lower-leg injuries on collapse or debris deployments? Tell us what happened.

02Does the protective gear available to you meet the need, and where does it fall short?

03Would your organization try a field prototype?

Replies go straight to me, not a form.

Tell us what you’ve seen in the field.

sooahkang82@gmail.com

Sooah Kang · Partnerships Lead · TNT

Download one-pager (PDF)
RescuePaw wordmark and shield logo in white.

Protection that thinks, on feet that feel.

Team TNT

We are a Seoul-based student team and finalists in Korea’s 2026 ICT Smart Device National Competition, run by the Ministry of Science and ICT. We are moving from concept to prototype now, and what will make this real is the field experience of the handlers and K9 organizations who do this work every day. That is why we are asking.

Jaehyun Kim

Technical Lead

Portrait of Sooah Kang, Partnerships Lead of Team TNT.

Sooah Kang

Partnerships Lead

LinkedIn ↗

Seyeon Jeong

Strategy Lead